Canada’s Immigration Requirements: LICO (Low Income Cut-Off) – A Lawyer’s View

By Author: Admin | February 22, 2010

Some very basic facts: the Low Income Cut Off goes up every year.  It is mandatory for a sponsor to meet the LICO when sponsoring parents and their dependent children.  Meeting the LICO is  a badge of confidence you can show to Canada’s immigration department, promising that the relatives who you sponsor will not be a burden on Canada’s social services for three or ten years from the date the sponsored relatives obtain their Canadian immigration visas.

The LICO can impact marriage sponsorships.  Normally, the LICO is not applicable when sponsoring a spouse with underage dependent children.  However, a visa officer overseas has the discretion to use the LICO as a guideline.  This is done primarily where a sponsor of a spouse presents very, very little income (let’s say, for example, only $18,000.00 per year), and the sponsored spouse is bringing two children.  Given the fact that the 2010 LICO for four people is $39,455 (as per the Current Canada Immigration website for 2011), a visa officer can have a very legitimate concern that the sponsor will not be able to keep his spouse and children off of Canada’s social assistance for three or ten years).  In such a circumstance, the visa officer can have reference to the LICO and determine that an application to sponsor a spouse and children should be refused on financial grounds.

However, a sponsor of a spouse who is refused in such a situation can have recourse to the Immigration Appeal Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board, where a judge (or more precisely, a Member), can review the financial situation and grant approve the sponsorship despite the lack of income of the sponsor.

The Member at the IAD would have regard to humanitarian and compassionate factors and other circumstances, such as the employability of the person being sponsored, the age of any dependent children being sponsored, the proven financial worth of the person being sponsored, and many other factors.

I have come across a situation where a sponsor of a parent has had to pay the province of Ontario over CAD$100,000.00 due to a sponsored parent taking social assistance for many years.  The sponsorship agreement is a document that both the sponsor and the sponsored parent or spouse signs and it sets out in detail the obligations of the sponsor. This is likely a rare occurrence, as the slow processing times for parents that characterize Canada’s immigration system appears to ensure that parents are unable to get their permanent resident visas until they are close to passing away, or are too ill to pass the immigration medical.

LICO Effective until December 31, 2011

Size of Family Unit Minimum necessary income
1 person (the sponsor) $22,229
2 persons $27,674
3 persons $34,022
4 persons $41,307
5 persons $46,850
6 persons $52,838
7 persons $58,827
More than 7 persons, for each additional person, add $5,989

.

New Graphic
New Comers Guide To Canada

Our strict privacy policy keeps your email address 100% safe & secure.

I was born and raised in Toronto, Ontario Canada. I am an accomplished author and lecturer and am consulted by the media and other immigration lawyers and consultants on immigration matters and challenging immigration cases, appeals, and federal court matters.

Please call me for any Canadian immigration issues or concerns you may have: 416-447-6118

Read more about Chaudhary Law Office on Google places, Twitter, and Linkedin.

For Immediate Immigration Help,
Call Us Now
416-447-6118

Contact Information

Chaudhary Law Office
18 Wynford Drive Suite 707, Toronto
Ontario , M3C 3S2 Canada
Phone: 416-447- 6118
Fax: 416-447-6746

Client Testimonials


Salam Max

MY spouse [xxxxxx] has received her passport back with the immigrant Visa and landing papers and other related doxs. All of the dox are attatched for your references. congratulations and Thanks Thanks Thanks

-Hamid



Hello again Max

I just wanted to thank you again for your exertions yesterday and for all your preparation leading up to the hearing. I felt that I was well represented and that you articulated the issues and the argument for my case very clearly. Look forward to hearing from the judge next. Hope you are feeling better today,

-Anne Marie


Read More