Canada’s Immigration Department – Overstepping its Authority

By Author: Admin | March 24, 2012

The current (as of July 2011) form (numbered “IMM 5476”) that Canada’s immigration department requires to be submitted in many applications states as follows: “a representative is someone who has provided advice or guidance to you prior to submitting your application and/or someone who has your permission to conduct business on your behalf with CIC and CBSA.”

The IMM 5476 is thus required to be submitted even if you have consulted a Canadian immigration lawyer, or, indeed, if you have consulted anyone and received advice from them regarding an immigration application. The reason for this rule is to help eliminate the ‘ghost consultants’ – those unlicensed immigration consultants who for a significantly reduced fee, often fill out forms, often in a sloppy manner. This sloppy, price-discounted form filling often ends in a refused case, and also, leads to irreparable damage to a person who is seeking the Canadian government’s permission to enter Canada.

The problem with the wording used in the IMM 5476 is that captures those smart, prudent people, who are on a budget, and seek advice from a Canadian immigration lawyer; those people who seek only advice about an immigration matter, and then engage Canada’s immigration department un-represented after obtaining said advice.
Under Canadian law, every person has the right to seek advice from a lawyer in absolute confidence. The questions asked of the lawyer and the advice given by the lawyer to a client are confidential. Even the mere seeking of advice of an opinion from a lawyer is absolutely confidential. The current Immigration regulations, however, ignore this fact. The current Immigration regulations state as follows:

  • (2) The application shall, unless otherwise provided by these Regulations
  • (c.3) if the applicant has been advised, for consideration in connection with the application, by a person referred to in any of paragraphs 91(2)(a) to (c) of the Act, include the information referred to in paragraphs (c.1) and (c.2) with respect to that person;
  • (c.4) if the applicant has been advised, for consideration in connection with the application, by an entity — or a person acting on its behalf — referred to in subsection 91(4) of the Act, include the information referred to in paragraph (c.1) with respect to that entity or person; and

In other words, the current regulations purport to oblige applicants to disclose the names of any lawyer they consult in the course of preparing their application to the immigration department. I have often been consulted on spousal applications (which are characterized by very complicated forms) where the couple, armed with my advice subsequently file the application themselves. I have also been consulted for ‘second opinions’ by persons who had seen one Canadian immigration lawyer but were not fully comfortable with the advice provided by the first Canadian immigration lawyer. The above section can slap a person who did not declare their seeking advice with a finding of a “material misrepresentation”, or a rejection of the entire application on the basis of being incomplete. The misrepresentation results in a two year ban from Canada, and a significantly more difficult time re-entering Canada after the two years has expired.

Every legitimate Canadian immigration lawyer and consultant agrees with Canada’s immigration department about the blight that ghost consultants cause. However, the above regulation as it is written is too overreaching; it should be amended or interpreted to focus more on the real culprits – ghost consultants.

Connect with me on Google+ at Max Chaudhary.

New Graphic
New Comers Guide To Canada

Our strict privacy policy keeps your email address 100% safe & secure.

I was born and raised in Toronto, Ontario Canada. I am an accomplished author and lecturer and am consulted by the media and other immigration lawyers and consultants on immigration matters and challenging immigration cases, appeals, and federal court matters.

Please call me for any Canadian immigration issues or concerns you may have: 416-447-6118

Read more about Chaudhary Law Office on Google places, Twitter, and Linkedin.

For Immediate Immigration Help,
Call Us Now

Contact Information

Chaudhary Law Office
18 Wynford Drive Suite 707, Toronto
Ontario , M3C 3S2 Canada
Phone: 416-447- 6118
Fax: 416-447-6746

Client Testimonials

Salam Max

MY spouse [xxxxxx] has received her passport back with the immigrant Visa and landing papers and other related doxs. All of the dox are attatched for your references. congratulations and Thanks Thanks Thanks


Hello again Max

I just wanted to thank you again for your exertions yesterday and for all your preparation leading up to the hearing. I felt that I was well represented and that you articulated the issues and the argument for my case very clearly. Look forward to hearing from the judge next. Hope you are feeling better today,

-Anne Marie

Read More